Peer Review Process

  1. Editors first review the submitted manuscript, called initial review by the editors. It will be desk evaluated whether the submitted manuscript is suitable for the Journal of Dynamics, Monitoring and Diagnostics based on focus and scope, similarity score by using Crosscheck-iThenticate, methodological flaw, readability of the articles, and adhering to the submitted paper template.
  2. Furthermorethe manuscript will be sent to Associate Editors who will invite at least 2 anonymous reviewers (Single-Blind Peer-Review) and make a decision on the article. Once the Associate Editors submits their recommendation and the reviews, the Editor will review the recommendation and make a final decision.
  3. The accepted manuscript then continues to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.

Review Decisions

The editor is permitted to take the following actions in the stage of initial review:

  1. Return the paper without review because the paper is outside the scope of the journal.
  2. Return the paper without review because of the lack of readability of the article.
  3. Return the paper without review because the technical content is insufficient.
  4. Return the paper without review because the paper grossly exceeds the length limitations.

 Editor reviews the comments made by reviewers and is allowed to make the following decisions:

  1. Accept
  2. Revise
  3. Reject

After submitting revisions to the journal, authors are required to submit a rebuttal to the reviewer comments. Authors should fully address all reviewer comments, if an author does not agree with the change requested, the author should explain the reason in the rebuttal. If Editor feels that reviewer comments have been ignored, the Editor may reject the revised article.