Peer Review Process

The Journal of Dynamics, Monitoring and Diagnostics is a formally peer-reviewed journal. All publications in the journal undergo a single-blind peer review process where authors don't know the identiy of the reviewers.

1. Staffs of editorial office first review the submitted manuscript, called initial review. It will be desk evaluated whether the submitted manuscript is suitable for the Journal of Dynamics, Monitoring and Diagnostics based on focus and scope, similarity score by using Crosscheck-iThenticate, methodological flaw, readability of the articles, and adhering to the submitted paper template.
2. Furthermore, the manuscript will be sent to Associate Editors who will invite at least 2 reviewers. Once the Associate Editors submit their recommendation and the reviews, the Editors-in-Chief will review the recommendation and make a final decision.
3. The accepted manuscript then continues to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.

Review Decisions

The staffs of editorial office are permitted to take the following actions in the stage of initial review:

1. Return the paper without review because the paper is outside the scope of the journal.
2. Return the paper without review because of the lack of readability of the article.
3. Return the paper without review because the technical content is insufficient.
4. Return the paper without review because the paper grossly exceeds the length limitations.

Editors-in-Chief review the comments made by associate editors and reviewers and is allowed to make the following decisions:

1. Accept
2. Revise
3. Reject